Jamboard vs padlet8/11/2023 ![]() In particular, students are required to comment on the midterm and final reviews in Miro, which is usually led and dominated by external critics in a face-to-face environment. For reviews, individual critiques, or group projects, each board could be shared for students to provide feedback on each other's work. To facilitate these more high-stakes events, multiple boards were created, to allow students to add more resources, live or asynchronously and prevent the board from slowing down. practitioners, professors, experts), were invited to a specific board and able to add comments or post-it notes to the work of each student, while the review was facilitated live through Zoom. Peer, instructor, and external review: For key learning events such as midterm and final reviews, external reviewers (e.g. While students could create their own ‘board’, the template helped students focus on sharing their progress, and reduced potential challenges when navigating a new tool. Boards were created to facilitate group projects, individual projects, and reviews. Each board (with a template) included student names and was organized in a horizontal layout where students could add their files like presentations, drawings, or even CAD 3D models hosted in Sketchfab. Within each project, Professor Lamere created a board and structured each learning activity, assignment, or event into a template that students could easily add their content to. Professor Lamere also leverages Miro for a U-Link research project on Next Generation Coastal Structures.Ĭreation of collaborative spaces: For each course or research project, a Miro ‘project’ was created, and students were invited to contribute to the project area throughout the semester. Since Fall 2020, Miro was adopted for teaching in Fall 2020 and Spring 2021 courses, including a graduate course, ARC 699 - Directed Research (Pre-Thesis), and an upper-level undergraduate studio - SLICES: Structural Foam + Robotic Stereotomy (Architecture Design - ARC 407/509/510/609). ![]() After requesting a free educational license, and working with Academic Technologies’ Roberto Gonzalez to implement, Miro was adopted to support these activities for remote and hybrid classes. A digital whiteboard was necessary to support typical visual communication and learning experiences in architecture including the sharing of drafts in weekly-pin-up sessions, providing handwritten feedback, and presenting progress at midterm, and final reviews. Denis Hector, Associate Professor at the School of Architecture to narrow down a collaborative digital whiteboard that can support courses and research projects at the School of Architecture. In Summer 2020, Professor Lamere collaborated with Dr. Joel Lamere, Assistant Professor at the School of Architecture Use of Miro in ARC 699 - Directed Research Miro
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |